header-logo header-logo

Warring couples opt to make peace

23 April 2009
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Family

Divorcing couples are increasingly choosing to use collaborative law methods because of the credit crunch.

Law firm HBJ Gateley Wareing says the number of couples opting to settle out of court using collaborative law practices has risen by a third in the last year. This view supports a study by family lawyers’ group Resolution, which says the use of collaborative law in divorce proceedings had increased by 87% in 2006–07. Collaborative law uses amicable negotiations conducted face to face in four-way meetings between the parties and their lawyers. If either party later moves to litigation, both lawyers are disqualified from acting in the proceedings.

Sara Matheson, partner at HBJ Gateley Wareing, says: “Clients are keen to sort things out with as little further upheaval as possible. This is in part due to the credit crunch and the cost of often lengthy and acrimonious court wrangling, and in part to reduce the impact on any children involved. By opting for a collaborative legal process the chance that people can reach a solution that suits both parties is much higher, and outside the court room it is far easier to tailor a solution to suit personal circumstances.”

Issue: 7366 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—Ed Williams

DWF—Ed Williams

Public sector disputes capability bolstered by partner hire in Leeds

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Firm strengthens corporate, real estate and insolvency teams with partner trio

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Consultant and solicitor join commercial real estate team

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll