header-logo header-logo

Warring couples opt to make peace

23 April 2009
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Family

Divorcing couples are increasingly choosing to use collaborative law methods because of the credit crunch.

Law firm HBJ Gateley Wareing says the number of couples opting to settle out of court using collaborative law practices has risen by a third in the last year. This view supports a study by family lawyers’ group Resolution, which says the use of collaborative law in divorce proceedings had increased by 87% in 2006–07. Collaborative law uses amicable negotiations conducted face to face in four-way meetings between the parties and their lawyers. If either party later moves to litigation, both lawyers are disqualified from acting in the proceedings.

Sara Matheson, partner at HBJ Gateley Wareing, says: “Clients are keen to sort things out with as little further upheaval as possible. This is in part due to the credit crunch and the cost of often lengthy and acrimonious court wrangling, and in part to reduce the impact on any children involved. By opting for a collaborative legal process the chance that people can reach a solution that suits both parties is much higher, and outside the court room it is far easier to tailor a solution to suit personal circumstances.”

Issue: 7366 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll