header-logo header-logo

23 April 2009
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Warring couples opt to make peace

Family

Divorcing couples are increasingly choosing to use collaborative law methods because of the credit crunch.

Law firm HBJ Gateley Wareing says the number of couples opting to settle out of court using collaborative law practices has risen by a third in the last year. This view supports a study by family lawyers’ group Resolution, which says the use of collaborative law in divorce proceedings had increased by 87% in 2006–07. Collaborative law uses amicable negotiations conducted face to face in four-way meetings between the parties and their lawyers. If either party later moves to litigation, both lawyers are disqualified from acting in the proceedings.

Sara Matheson, partner at HBJ Gateley Wareing, says: “Clients are keen to sort things out with as little further upheaval as possible. This is in part due to the credit crunch and the cost of often lengthy and acrimonious court wrangling, and in part to reduce the impact on any children involved. By opting for a collaborative legal process the chance that people can reach a solution that suits both parties is much higher, and outside the court room it is far easier to tailor a solution to suit personal circumstances.”

Issue: 7366 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll