header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 May 2008 / Maria Guida , David Hookins
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Company , Property , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Waste not, want not

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

David Hookins and Maria Guida consider the impact of energy performance certificates

The EU's Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) has been in place since 6 April 2008 via Statutory Instrument 2007 No 991. This means that property owners now need to provide an energy performance certificate (EPC) when they construct, sell or lease a commercial building. Introducing this legislation to the marketplace has been controlled by staggering the requirement based on buildings' floor areas.

An EPC provides an energy rating for a building based on the performance of the structure and its existing services. The rating is in relation to how that building should perform in comparison with similar building stock.

An accompanying document is issued with the EPC recommending cost-effective energy improvements which, if implemented could enhance the energy performance of the building. The property owner has no duty to act on the recommendations, but the EU is currently drafting the “EPBD 2” and there is a strong possibility that in the future it will become

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll