header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007 / James Levy
Issue: 7262 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Wasted costs

Post Aerospace, companies can recover the costs of managing a crisis. James Levy reports

If one company breaches its obligations to another, the innocent company will often have to reorganise its internal resources and divert staff away from their usual duties to help manage and mitigate the effect of the breach.
Until recently, the law has not provided a clear answer about whether or not the ‘wasted’ internal losses that the company suffers because of the diversion are properly recoverable. However, the recent Court of Appeal decision in Aerospace Publishing Ltd v Thames Water Utilities Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 3, [2007] All ER (D) 02 (Jan) provides a steer about the circumstances in which wasted internal costs may be recovered.

Facts

In the summer of 2001, Aerospace’s premises were flooded as a result of a burst water main belonging to Thames Water. As part of its claim for damages, Aerospace sought to recover money paid to its staff for work necessarily carried out by them as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll