header-logo header-logo

Wasted costs

23 March 2007 / James Levy
Issue: 7262 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

Post Aerospace, companies can recover the costs of managing a crisis. James Levy reports

If one company breaches its obligations to another, the innocent company will often have to reorganise its internal resources and divert staff away from their usual duties to help manage and mitigate the effect of the breach.
Until recently, the law has not provided a clear answer about whether or not the ‘wasted’ internal losses that the company suffers because of the diversion are properly recoverable. However, the recent Court of Appeal decision in Aerospace Publishing Ltd v Thames Water Utilities Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 3, [2007] All ER (D) 02 (Jan) provides a steer about the circumstances in which wasted internal costs may be recovered.

Facts

In the summer of 2001, Aerospace’s premises were flooded as a result of a burst water main belonging to Thames Water. As part of its claim for damages, Aerospace sought to recover money paid to its staff for work necessarily carried out by them as a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll