header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 February 2023 / David Bailey-Vella
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs , Damages
printer mail-detail

Watching the QOCS

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
112056
Has the delicate balance put in place by Lord Justice Jackson toppled over? David Bailey-Vella reports on the new landscape for qualified one-way costs shifting
  • The landscape for qualified one-way costs shifting is changing after a raft of satellite litigation.
  • The biggest issue in recent years has been the ability of unsuccessful defendants to set off costs awarded to them against only the damages awarded to the claimant, with the courts indicating this is a matter for the Civil Procedure Rule Committee.
  • A new statutory instrument coming into effect in April appears to favour defendants, claimant lawyers argue.

When Lord Justice Jackson recommended the introduction of qualified one-way costs shifting (QOCS), I wonder if he anticipated just how much satellite litigation it would cause, and for how long.

There has been a rash of such cases, especially since last autumn. These include, in no particular order of importance:

  • Achille v Lawn Tennis Association Services Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 1407: the Court of Appeal held that dismissal of the personal injury
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll