header-logo header-logo

04 July 2013 / Tom Walker
Issue: 7567 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

The way to go

1713069981

Employers can now act with greater flexibility in a redundancy exercise, says Tom Walker

In today’s hard economic times, employers can act with greater flexibility in a redundancy exercise, but in turn are expected to show properly the thought and consideration that went into their decisions.

Perhaps this is in recognition of an obvious question: what is the point of a redundancy exercise unless it gives the best possible staffing structure to the business? There are still collective agreements to follow and many companies will have a redundancy procedure. More and more though, these general guidelines are only to be applied as appropriate to the needs of each situation. Indeed the ACAS Booklet on Redundancy Handling recommends that procedures include “room for manoeuvre”.

Over the years, we have seen the move away from rigid and impractical procedures. In terms of the pools, the selection criteria, the role of alternative employment and the order of the redundancy process, we are seeing the economic and organisational needs of the business gain more attention.

Business requirements

It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll