header-logo header-logo

The way to go

04 July 2013 / Tom Walker
Issue: 7567 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
1713069981

Employers can now act with greater flexibility in a redundancy exercise, says Tom Walker

In today’s hard economic times, employers can act with greater flexibility in a redundancy exercise, but in turn are expected to show properly the thought and consideration that went into their decisions.

Perhaps this is in recognition of an obvious question: what is the point of a redundancy exercise unless it gives the best possible staffing structure to the business? There are still collective agreements to follow and many companies will have a redundancy procedure. More and more though, these general guidelines are only to be applied as appropriate to the needs of each situation. Indeed the ACAS Booklet on Redundancy Handling recommends that procedures include “room for manoeuvre”.

Over the years, we have seen the move away from rigid and impractical procedures. In terms of the pools, the selection criteria, the role of alternative employment and the order of the redundancy process, we are seeing the economic and organisational needs of the business gain more attention.

Business requirements

It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll