header-logo header-logo

13 December 2013 / David McIntyre
Issue: 7588 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail

We can work it out

web_mcintyre

David McIntyre provides a personal view of ADR from an expert engineer

Disputes consume energy and resources that could otherwise be used to make positive contributions to businesses and society as a whole. Sadly, disagreements are an inevitable consequence of human interaction and irrespective of what we try to do to prevent them from occurring they still happen. Indeed we have created an industry to deal with them.

 

Quick & decisive

For all our sakes, we need to resolve disputes as efficiently as possible. I am not advocating a return to duelling or bare knuckle fights. However, these methods did have the advantage of being quick and decisive. Even though in the construction industry we usually do not now settle our differences by combat, there is still a tendency to declare war any time there is a disagreement.

Disputes arise out of time pressures, money, inappropriate allocation of risks, conflicts of interests etc. However, parties are often reluctant to contemplate that their project will get into difficulties; perhaps it is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll