header-logo header-logo

We can work it out

13 December 2013 / David McIntyre
Issue: 7588 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail
web_mcintyre

David McIntyre provides a personal view of ADR from an expert engineer

Disputes consume energy and resources that could otherwise be used to make positive contributions to businesses and society as a whole. Sadly, disagreements are an inevitable consequence of human interaction and irrespective of what we try to do to prevent them from occurring they still happen. Indeed we have created an industry to deal with them.

 

Quick & decisive

For all our sakes, we need to resolve disputes as efficiently as possible. I am not advocating a return to duelling or bare knuckle fights. However, these methods did have the advantage of being quick and decisive. Even though in the construction industry we usually do not now settle our differences by combat, there is still a tendency to declare war any time there is a disagreement.

Disputes arise out of time pressures, money, inappropriate allocation of risks, conflicts of interests etc. However, parties are often reluctant to contemplate that their project will get into difficulties; perhaps it is similar

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll