02 July 2021 / Michael Zander KC

Issue: 7939 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights

We protest at these protest provisions

Michael Zander QC on a report by the parliamentary Joint Human Rights Committee

Joint Human Rights Committee makes serious criticism of the public order provisions in the government’s Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.
Criticism includes a demand to remove the trigger for imposing conditions on processions and assemblies based on the noise and concern that the public nuisance offence may be used to criminalise non-violent protest.

A report of the parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights makes serious criticism of the public order provisions in the government’s Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill (HC 331, HL Paper 23, 22 June 2021).

The powerfully argued and strongly expressed 40-page report of the respected joint committee currently chaired by Baroness (Harriet) Harman, is bound to play a significant role when the Bill’s controversial public order provisions are debated by the House of Lords.

Noise

The joint committee says that the new trigger for imposing conditions on processions and assemblies based on the noise they generate should be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

We protest at these protest provisions

Michael Zander QC on a report by the parliamentary Joint Human Rights Committee

Joint Human Rights Committee makes serious criticism of the public order provisions in the government’s Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.
Criticism includes a demand to remove the trigger for imposing conditions on processions and assemblies based on the noise and concern that the public nuisance offence may be used to criminalise non-violent protest.

Noise

The joint committee says that the new trigger for imposing conditions on processions and assemblies based on the noise they generate should be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

Commercial property and child law teams expand with senior hires

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Set expands London and Singapore offering with senior international disputes hires

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Firm strengthens real estate and litigation teams with partner promotions

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Burnout behind the billable hour

Behind the profession’s polished exterior, lawyers are ‘internally drained rather than physically tired’, according to a stark assessment of burnout in legal practice

NLJ this week: Domestic abuse reforms still falling short

Five years after the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 came into force, concerns remain that the family courts continue to minimise allegations of abuse in child contact disputes

NLJ this week: Uber’s legal shield faces scrutiny on both sides of the Atlantic

Uber has built a formidable strategy for insulating itself from liability for drivers’ conduct, but the legal terrain differs sharply between the US and England and Wales

NLJ this week: Hereditary peers era finally comes to an end

The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 marks a constitutional watershed by severing the centuries-old link between hereditary titles and automatic membership of the upper chamber

NLJ this week: Is it finally time to scrap Part III?

The Civil Justice Council’s review of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 could mark the end of what one commentator calls an ‘outdated’ and overly technical regime governing solicitor-client fee disputes

Error message

We protest at these protest provisions

Noise

Noise

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth