header-logo header-logo

We protest at these protest provisions

02 July 2021 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail
52122
Michael Zander QC on a report by the parliamentary Joint Human Rights Committee
  • Joint Human Rights Committee makes serious criticism of the public order provisions in the government’s Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.
  • Criticism includes a demand to remove the trigger for imposing conditions on processions and assemblies based on the noise and concern that the public nuisance offence may be used to criminalise non-violent protest.

A report of the parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights makes serious criticism of the public order provisions in the government’s Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill (HC 331, HL Paper 23, 22 June 2021).

The powerfully argued and strongly expressed 40-page report of the respected joint committee currently chaired by Baroness (Harriet) Harman, is bound to play a significant role when the Bill’s controversial public order provisions are debated by the House of Lords.

Noise

The joint committee says that the new trigger for imposing conditions on processions and assemblies based on the noise they generate should be removed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll