header-logo header-logo

01 October 2009 / Veronica Bailey
Issue: 7387 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Web of lies

Veronica Bailey asks whether ISPs & search engines are liable for defamation on the internet

The decision in Metropolitan International Schools v Google ([2009] EWHC 1765 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 263 (Jul) clarified the law on the liability of search engines and internet service providers (ISP’s) for defamation.

Eady J applied common law principles of defamation to the modern phenomenon of the internet to decide whether the operator of a search engine, Google, could be liable for publication.

Google finds information by automated means. It has no control over the search terms entered by its users or of the material which is placed on the world wide web. Eady J concluded that as there was no human intervention in the search function, Google was not liable as a publisher for the content found by the search.

Eady J followed his earlier decision in Blunt v Tilley [2006] IP & T 798 where he said that an ISP was not liable for defamatory content posted by individuals using its internet services. He concluded

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll