header-logo header-logo

07 April 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Wedlake Bell—Matthew Brunsdon-Tully

Family partner joins law firm

Wedlake Bell has recently appointed new Partner Matthew Brunsdon-Tully. Matthew will also be Head of Family ADR and Innovation.

Matthew is acknowledged as a leader in his field. He is Top Recommended in Spear’s 500 2021 and 2022, has been described by the Legal 500 as being “energetic, empathetic and can always see the bigger picture”, and in Chambers HNW is ranked in Band 3 where he is described as “fantastic”, having “real clarity of thought” and as someone who gives “top-quality advice”.

Matthew is also Vice-Chair of the Resolution Pensions, Tax and Financial Remedies Committee.

Matthew started practice as a Barrister at leading chambers 1 Hare Court where he gained expertise in all areas of family litigation including financial remedies, private law children, and jurisdiction disputes, and was junior counsel of choice for a number of leading matrimonial firms. He was previously ranked in Chambers UK Bar, where he was described as a “star of the future”. Since 2019 he has been a Partner at Forsters where he has developed further significant expertise, including, in particular, in pre-nuptial agreements, as well as in other forms of dispute resolution within family law.

Matthew is adept in advising high net worth clients on matrimonial finance disputes and children matters, including conducting Private FDRs.

Commenting on his appointment, Matthew said: 'I am really excited to be taking on my new position, building on my experience since stepping across from the Bar, and to be given the chance to explore and develop new services and offerings around legal tech in family law. I am also particularly looking forward to working alongside and helping to grow this extremely talented and highly regarded Family team and contributing towards the practice’s continued growth.'

Martin Arnold, Managing Partner at Wedlake Bell, added: 'I am delighted to welcome Matthew to the Wedlake Bell partnership. He is an outstanding lawyer with a wealth of expertise and experience that will add incredible value to the firm’s Family offering. I speak on behalf of all of us at Wedlake Bell, when I say we can’t wait to welcome Matthew'.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll