header-logo header-logo

Wedlake Bell—Matthew Brunsdon-Tully

07 April 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Family partner joins law firm

Wedlake Bell has recently appointed new Partner Matthew Brunsdon-Tully. Matthew will also be Head of Family ADR and Innovation.

Matthew is acknowledged as a leader in his field. He is Top Recommended in Spear’s 500 2021 and 2022, has been described by the Legal 500 as being “energetic, empathetic and can always see the bigger picture”, and in Chambers HNW is ranked in Band 3 where he is described as “fantastic”, having “real clarity of thought” and as someone who gives “top-quality advice”.

Matthew is also Vice-Chair of the Resolution Pensions, Tax and Financial Remedies Committee.

Matthew started practice as a Barrister at leading chambers 1 Hare Court where he gained expertise in all areas of family litigation including financial remedies, private law children, and jurisdiction disputes, and was junior counsel of choice for a number of leading matrimonial firms. He was previously ranked in Chambers UK Bar, where he was described as a “star of the future”. Since 2019 he has been a Partner at Forsters where he has developed further significant expertise, including, in particular, in pre-nuptial agreements, as well as in other forms of dispute resolution within family law.

Matthew is adept in advising high net worth clients on matrimonial finance disputes and children matters, including conducting Private FDRs.

Commenting on his appointment, Matthew said: 'I am really excited to be taking on my new position, building on my experience since stepping across from the Bar, and to be given the chance to explore and develop new services and offerings around legal tech in family law. I am also particularly looking forward to working alongside and helping to grow this extremely talented and highly regarded Family team and contributing towards the practice’s continued growth.'

Martin Arnold, Managing Partner at Wedlake Bell, added: 'I am delighted to welcome Matthew to the Wedlake Bell partnership. He is an outstanding lawyer with a wealth of expertise and experience that will add incredible value to the firm’s Family offering. I speak on behalf of all of us at Wedlake Bell, when I say we can’t wait to welcome Matthew'.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
back-to-top-scroll