header-logo header-logo

01 April 2020
Issue: 7881 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 3 April 2020

Consumer protection

Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2020] EWHC 672 (QB), [2020] All ER (D) 158 (Mar)

The proceedings raised a point of some general importance, concerning the interaction of s 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980), which deprived a defendant of a limitation defence if he had deliberately concealed a breach of duty, with s 140A-D of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974). The respondent alleged that she had been mis-sold payment protection insurance, in respect of which the appellant company (then trading by a different name), from which she had taken a loan, had received a commission. The respondent brought a claim to recover the balance of the premia she had paid, together with contractual and statutory interest, relying on CCA 1974, s 140A-D. The appellant relied on the defence of limitation, however, the recorder found in the respondent’s favour. The Queen’s Bench Division, in dismissing the appellant’s appeal, construed LA 1980 s 32(2) and held that the appellant’s non-disclosure of the commission had been unfair

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll