header-logo header-logo

02 March 2018
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Claim form

Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12 [2018] All ER (D) 109 (Feb)

The appellant’s appeal against the refusal of the Court of Appeal, Civil Division to retrospectively validate service of his claim was dismissed. The Supreme Court held that the appellant had made no attempt to serve his claim in accordance with the rules. There was no reason why he ought to be absolved from his errors at the respondent’s expense.

Family proceedings

Re A-F (children) (care orders: restrictions on liberty) [2018] EWHC 138 (Fam) [2018] All ER (D) 21 (Feb)

The present test cases raised various substantive and procedural questions in relation to the interface between care proceedings brought in the Family Court, pursuant to Pt IV of the Children Act 1989, and the requirements of art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Family Division held that the situation of the young or very young did not involve a confinement, gave a rule of thumb on at what point in the child’s development a child became confined,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll