header-logo header-logo

13 February 2020
Issue: 7874 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Anonymity

DXB (by his litigation friend) v Persons Unknown and others [2020] EWHC 134 (QB), [2020] All ER (D) 129 (Jan)

The claimant’s claim, pursuant to ‘the Venables jurisdiction’, for an order extending anonymity in respect of criminal proceedings, which arose following the fatal stabbing of a young boy, and in which he had been a co-defendant, was dismissed. The claimant had not been charged for murder, but he had been convicted of possession of a bladed article (the offence), the most significant aggravating feature of which had been that he had bought the knife with which the deceased had been killed. The Queen’s Bench Division held that the circumstances did not justify granting an extended period of anonymity pursuant to the Venables jurisdiction and that, while the claimant had demonstrated that, if his anonymity was not extended, that would give rise to an interference with his right to private and family life under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the curtailment of his, and his family’s, right

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll