header-logo header-logo

13 February 2020
Issue: 7874 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Anonymity

DXB (by his litigation friend) v Persons Unknown and others [2020] EWHC 134 (QB), [2020] All ER (D) 129 (Jan)

The claimant’s claim, pursuant to ‘the Venables jurisdiction’, for an order extending anonymity in respect of criminal proceedings, which arose following the fatal stabbing of a young boy, and in which he had been a co-defendant, was dismissed. The claimant had not been charged for murder, but he had been convicted of possession of a bladed article (the offence), the most significant aggravating feature of which had been that he had bought the knife with which the deceased had been killed. The Queen’s Bench Division held that the circumstances did not justify granting an extended period of anonymity pursuant to the Venables jurisdiction and that, while the claimant had demonstrated that, if his anonymity was not extended, that would give rise to an interference with his right to private and family life under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the curtailment of his, and his family’s, right

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll