header-logo header-logo

15 December 2017
Issue: 7774 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Disciplinary proceedings

Bar Standards Board v Crawford [2017] EWHC 3101 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 21 (Dec)

The sanction of a reprimand imposed on the respondent had been within the appropriate range open to the Disciplinary Tribunal of the Council of the Inns of Court. Accordingly, the Divisional Court dismissed the appellant Bar Standards Board’s appeal. It further made observations arising out of the appeal that might assist future appeals by the Bar Standards Board.

Contempt of court

Simmonds (as trustee in bankruptcy of Mr Albert James Pearce) v Pearce (a bankrupt) [2017] EWHC 3126 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 10 (Dec)

As it was the first time that an application for committal had been lodged with the Administrative Court in respect of breaches of the Insolvency Act 1986, ss 312, 333 and 363 using the procedure set out in CPR 81.15, the Divisional Court gave guidance on the correct procedure. It then endorsed the claimant trustee in bankruptcy’s certification that the respondent bankrupt, without reasonable excuse, had failed to comply with his obligation under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll