header-logo header-logo

25 May 2018
Issue: 7794 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Arbitration

SCM Financial Overseas Ltd v Raga Establishment Ltd [2018] EWHC 1008 (Comm), [2018] All ER (D) 57 (May)

The claimant company’s challenged to an arbitration award on the ground of serious irregularity failed. The Commercial Court held that the arbitrators’ decision not to defer issue of the award until further evidence had been available, had not amounted to a breach of their duties under the Arbitration Act 1996.

Conflict of laws

KMG International NV v Chen and another [2018] EWHC 1078 (Comm), [2018] All ER (D) 72 (May)

The first defendant had not established that England was not an appropriate forum for the trial of a claim seeking compensation in respect of the alleged unlawful dissipation of assets owned by a Dutch company, or that the Dutch courts were clearly or distinctly more appropriate than the English courts. Accordingly, the Commercial Court dismissed the first defendant’s application for a stay of the proceedings. Further, the court dismissed the second defendant BVI company’s application to set aside permission to serve it out of the jurisdiction.

Contract

Motortrak

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll