header-logo header-logo

22 November 2019
Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Civil litigation
Bailey and others v GlaxoSmithKline [2019] EWCA Civ 1924, [2019] All ER (D) 65 (Nov)

In a group action by the claimants against the defendant pharmaceutical company concerning an antidepressant drug, Seroxat, alleged to be defective under s 3 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987, the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the claimants appeal against a preliminary ruling of the Queen’s Bench Division. The appeal court ruled that the claimants had not been entitled to put their case on a risk/benefit basis at the start of the trial, as previous case management rulings had held that the case was to be based on ‘the worst in the class’ scenario basis.

Contempt of court
Jet 2 Holidays Ltd v Hughes and another [2019] EWCA Civ 1858, [2019] All ER (D) 66 (Nov)

A witness statement, verified by a statement of truth, made by a prospective claimant before the commencement of proceedings, in purported compliance with a pre-action protocol, could give rise to contempt and be the subject of an application for committal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll