header-logo header-logo

22 November 2019
Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Civil litigation
Bailey and others v GlaxoSmithKline [2019] EWCA Civ 1924, [2019] All ER (D) 65 (Nov)

In a group action by the claimants against the defendant pharmaceutical company concerning an antidepressant drug, Seroxat, alleged to be defective under s 3 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987, the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the claimants appeal against a preliminary ruling of the Queen’s Bench Division. The appeal court ruled that the claimants had not been entitled to put their case on a risk/benefit basis at the start of the trial, as previous case management rulings had held that the case was to be based on ‘the worst in the class’ scenario basis.

Contempt of court
Jet 2 Holidays Ltd v Hughes and another [2019] EWCA Civ 1858, [2019] All ER (D) 66 (Nov)

A witness statement, verified by a statement of truth, made by a prospective claimant before the commencement of proceedings, in purported compliance with a pre-action protocol, could give rise to contempt and be the subject of an application for committal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll