header-logo header-logo

05 July 2018
Issue: 7800 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Deed

Wessely and another (Joint Liquidators of Laishley Ltd, in Liquidation) v White [2018] EWHC 1499 (Ch), [2018] All ER (D) 128 (Jun)

The applicant liquidators’ claim against the respondent failed. The respondent had executed two deeds of release, by which the employer and employee were released from future performance under a contract. The Chancery Division held that the burden of proof did not lie on the respondent to prove that his actions or omissions had not caused loss to the company, or that the burden of proof should be reduced. Further, there had been no breach of the respondent’s duties.

European Union

MB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions C-451/16, [2018] All ER (D) 135 (Jun)

Council Directive (EEC) 79/7, in particular the first indent of Art 4(1), read in conjunction with the third indent of Arts 3(1)(a) and 7(1)(a) thereof, should be interpreted as precluding national legislation which required a person who had changed gender not only to fulfil physical, social and psychological criteria but also to satisfy the condition

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll