header-logo header-logo

24 January 2019
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Criminal law

Gerber v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2018] EWHC 3549 (QB), [2019] All ER (D) 52 (Jan)

The claimant’s appeal against a decision to dismiss his claim for assault and false imprisonment against the defendant was dismissed. The Queen’s Bench Division found that the judge had not erred in law in deciding there were no disputed issues of fact that the jury was required to determine and in discharging the jury without them having returned a verdict, nor in dismissing the claimant’s claim in favour of the defendant in the circumstances.

Employment

Hyperama plc v Poulis and another [2018] EWHC 3483 (QB), [2019] All ER (D) 53 (Jan)

The claimant succeeded in its application for injunctive relief against the defendants, requiring them to deliver up various property on their doorsteps. The Queen’s Bench Division held that the relief sought was justified in the circumstances, as the potential damage to the claimants could be very serious; there was clear evidence that the defendants had electronic copies of a substantial amount of the claimant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll