header-logo header-logo

16 April 2014 / Jeff Zindani
Issue: 7603 / Categories: Opinion , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Weighted dice

Routinely inflating success fees to get the magic 25% is courting disaster, warns Jeff Zindani

I have presented a series of seminars on the business consequences of the Jackson reforms and have probably lectured to more than 200 lawyers, many of whom are partners or directors in small to medium sized personal injury firms.

A year into the reforms, my concern has been not with the politics of the reforms (what is happening at the coalface is more important), but making sense of how they affect personal injury practices and how they are responding to the changes. My overall message is that personal injury work for claimant lawyers can still be profitable, but firms must “retool” to cope with the largely fixed costs landscape.

Much of this is set out in my book with Professor Dominic Regan on Surviving Jackson (2013, Sun Legal Publishing). In the words of Peter Drucker: “The organisations likely to suffer the most are those with the delusion that tomorrow will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll