header-logo header-logo

18 May 2017
Issue: 7746 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

What do businesses value most from external counsel?

‘Responsiveness’ is the most important factor when in-house counsel choose external law firms, new research shows.

It was rated 8.8 out of 10 in terms of importance, closely followed by ‘understanding of the business’ (8.6) and ‘deep specialist expertise’ (7.6), in a survey of more than 200 in-house lawyers by Thomson Reuters, Differentiation factor: What do businesses value most from external counsel?

Technology and innovative service delivery are also important—more so than personal relationships between in-house counsel and lawyers at the firm.

‘There is now tremendous pressure on law firms to understand, agree and keep to, service level agreements with their clients, and to ensure their responses reflect the commercial and wider-industry in which the client operates,’ said Samantha Steer, a director at Thomsons.

Issue: 7746 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll