header-logo header-logo

09 August 2024 / Nikki Edwards
Issue: 8083 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR , Dispute resolution , Family , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Dispute resolution under Labour: looking ahead

185047
ADR has the potential to alleviate various pressures on the courts, but Nikki Edwards argues for a nuanced approach
  • The London Solicitors Litigation Association is in favour of proposed rule changes when it comes to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) but recommends specifically revising the wording in CPR 1.1 to avoid imposing ADR improperly.
  • The Labour government should champion the development of ADR in the UK but proceed with caution and avoid a one size fits all approach.

As the new Labour government settles into office, it has yet to articulate a clear position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR). However, given its broader commitment to justice reform and support for working people, I anticipate it will be on the agenda once the first 100 days are out of the way.

Given Keir Starmer’s background as a lawyer, we can expect he has a good understanding of the challenges facing the legal system. These include the limited resources that the courts currently have, the time it takes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll