header-logo header-logo

Dispute resolution under Labour: looking ahead

09 August 2024 / Nikki Edwards
Issue: 8083 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR , Dispute resolution , Family , Mediation
printer mail-detail
185047
ADR has the potential to alleviate various pressures on the courts, but Nikki Edwards argues for a nuanced approach
  • The London Solicitors Litigation Association is in favour of proposed rule changes when it comes to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) but recommends specifically revising the wording in CPR 1.1 to avoid imposing ADR improperly.
  • The Labour government should champion the development of ADR in the UK but proceed with caution and avoid a one size fits all approach.

As the new Labour government settles into office, it has yet to articulate a clear position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR). However, given its broader commitment to justice reform and support for working people, I anticipate it will be on the agenda once the first 100 days are out of the way.

Given Keir Starmer’s background as a lawyer, we can expect he has a good understanding of the challenges facing the legal system. These include the limited resources that the courts currently have, the time it takes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll