header-logo header-logo

17 May 2007 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

What happens next?

Will the Ministry of Justice be fit for purpose? Geoffrey Bindman reports

As we awaited the election, or more likely coronation, of Gordon Brown as leader of the Labour Party and Prime Minister we learned of the resignation of the Home Secretary, John Reid, soon after his announcement of a major reorganisation of his department. Creating a new Ministry of Justice, abolishing the Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA), and allocating its functions and many of the functions of the Home Office to the new ministry would seem to demand careful thought and preparation.

Yet the changes were announced by Reid on 29 March and, without consultation or Parliamentary debate, have already been implemented on 9 May. In the first week of May I was told by a senior official of the DCA that it was still not clear whether after 9 May the office of Lord Chancellor would still exist and, if so, whether it had any continuing functions.

Lord Falconer, who until 9 May was Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Private client department announces partner hire

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Firm appoints first joint heads of Wales office

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Global dispute resolution team promotes two partners in Guernsey and Cayman Islands

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll