header-logo header-logo

17 May 2007 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

What happens next?

Will the Ministry of Justice be fit for purpose? Geoffrey Bindman reports

As we awaited the election, or more likely coronation, of Gordon Brown as leader of the Labour Party and Prime Minister we learned of the resignation of the Home Secretary, John Reid, soon after his announcement of a major reorganisation of his department. Creating a new Ministry of Justice, abolishing the Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA), and allocating its functions and many of the functions of the Home Office to the new ministry would seem to demand careful thought and preparation.

Yet the changes were announced by Reid on 29 March and, without consultation or Parliamentary debate, have already been implemented on 9 May. In the first week of May I was told by a senior official of the DCA that it was still not clear whether after 9 May the office of Lord Chancellor would still exist and, if so, whether it had any continuing functions.

Lord Falconer, who until 9 May was Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll