header-logo header-logo

What happens next?

17 May 2007 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Will the Ministry of Justice be fit for purpose? Geoffrey Bindman reports

As we awaited the election, or more likely coronation, of Gordon Brown as leader of the Labour Party and Prime Minister we learned of the resignation of the Home Secretary, John Reid, soon after his announcement of a major reorganisation of his department. Creating a new Ministry of Justice, abolishing the Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA), and allocating its functions and many of the functions of the Home Office to the new ministry would seem to demand careful thought and preparation.

Yet the changes were announced by Reid on 29 March and, without consultation or Parliamentary debate, have already been implemented on 9 May. In the first week of May I was told by a senior official of the DCA that it was still not clear whether after 9 May the office of Lord Chancellor would still exist and, if so, whether it had any continuing functions.

Lord Falconer, who until 9 May was Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll