header-logo header-logo

What junior lawyers want

28 February 2019 / Matthew Kay
Issue: 7830 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Law firms which subscribe to common misconceptions about the millennial generation are missing a trick, says Matthew Kay

 

‘Building a better future will depend on our ability to appreciate generational differences.’ So says author and commentator Mal Fletcher, and it is true (Fascinating Times: A Social Commentary , 2012). At the moment, it is the millennial generation which is shaking up the workplace, but as Mal mentions, it is so important that employers are focused on specifically catering for the different generations, especially as we are in a unique situation currently where some businesses may have five generations working at any one time. Much has been written about the millennial generation and how their different upbringing has created an outlook which is impacting the workplace; back to Mal Fletcher, who describes this: ‘Millennials aspire to marry the blue skies thinking of the Boomers with the grass-roots mindset of GenX’.

Snowflake generation?

Misconceptions about millennials are common: you only have to open a newspaper or scroll through social media to see accusations that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll