header-logo header-logo

What junior lawyers want

28 February 2019 / Matthew Kay
Issue: 7830 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Law firms which subscribe to common misconceptions about the millennial generation are missing a trick, says Matthew Kay

 

‘Building a better future will depend on our ability to appreciate generational differences.’ So says author and commentator Mal Fletcher, and it is true (Fascinating Times: A Social Commentary , 2012). At the moment, it is the millennial generation which is shaking up the workplace, but as Mal mentions, it is so important that employers are focused on specifically catering for the different generations, especially as we are in a unique situation currently where some businesses may have five generations working at any one time. Much has been written about the millennial generation and how their different upbringing has created an outlook which is impacting the workplace; back to Mal Fletcher, who describes this: ‘Millennials aspire to marry the blue skies thinking of the Boomers with the grass-roots mindset of GenX’.

Snowflake generation?

Misconceptions about millennials are common: you only have to open a newspaper or scroll through social media to see accusations that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll