header-logo header-logo

Property: what lies beneath?

13 September 2024 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 8085 / Categories: Features , Property , Local authority , Nuisance
printer mail-detail
188886
Andrew Francis considers two ‘subterranean’ property cases, highlighting the importance of knowing what’s underneath the surface—literally & metaphorically
  • Considers in depth two cases, one concerning high-voltage electricity cables and the other related to Japanese knotweed.
  • These cases show how those involved in property transactions and related litigation should ask key questions in order to avoid or resolve disputes.

Unlike the film about supernatural events under the same title, released in 2000 (observant readers may have noticed the presence of the question mark in the title, differentiating this piece from the film), the topic considered in this article concerns two court judgments of high authority relating to what lies beneath land in very different circumstances.

These judgments concern high-voltage electricity cables and Japanese knotweed. Both are ‘live’ and the evidential thread which links them is that the source of the dispute was that each lay beneath the surface. The first is about solicitor’s professional negligence and the second is about causation of loss in private nuisance claims. The cases are Spire Property

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll