header-logo header-logo

Property: what lies beneath?

13 September 2024 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 8085 / Categories: Features , Property , Local authority , Nuisance
printer mail-detail
188886
Andrew Francis considers two ‘subterranean’ property cases, highlighting the importance of knowing what’s underneath the surface—literally & metaphorically
  • Considers in depth two cases, one concerning high-voltage electricity cables and the other related to Japanese knotweed.
  • These cases show how those involved in property transactions and related litigation should ask key questions in order to avoid or resolve disputes.

Unlike the film about supernatural events under the same title, released in 2000 (observant readers may have noticed the presence of the question mark in the title, differentiating this piece from the film), the topic considered in this article concerns two court judgments of high authority relating to what lies beneath land in very different circumstances.

These judgments concern high-voltage electricity cables and Japanese knotweed. Both are ‘live’ and the evidential thread which links them is that the source of the dispute was that each lay beneath the surface. The first is about solicitor’s professional negligence and the second is about causation of loss in private nuisance claims. The cases are Spire Property

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll