header-logo header-logo

What lies beneath

26 March 2019 / Matthew Hoe
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Matthew Hoe considers if Roman v AXA Insurance is the tip of the preservation of costs’ iceberg

  • Roman v AXA Insurance: is it always possible to preserve rights to costs after a personal injury claim has moved from one firm to another?

 It’s a time of upheaval and market consolidation. Personal injury claims often move from one firm to another. Firms should be on the lookout to preserve rights to costs, but the recent case of Roman v AXA Insurance (13 December 2018, County Court at Central London) might be the tip of the iceberg in showing that isn’t always achieved.

There is doubtless a raft of reasons why solicitors may cease to act. For one, the 2013 reforms gradually prompted several firms to make a commercial decision to leave the personal injury market. But those file moves were happening long before 2013, and in costs assessments they were not probed too hard. It was moves that straddled the 2013 reforms which increased the focus. Paying parties were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll