header-logo header-logo

26 March 2019 / Matthew Hoe
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

What lies beneath

Matthew Hoe considers if Roman v AXA Insurance is the tip of the preservation of costs’ iceberg

  • Roman v AXA Insurance: is it always possible to preserve rights to costs after a personal injury claim has moved from one firm to another?

 It’s a time of upheaval and market consolidation. Personal injury claims often move from one firm to another. Firms should be on the lookout to preserve rights to costs, but the recent case of Roman v AXA Insurance (13 December 2018, County Court at Central London) might be the tip of the iceberg in showing that isn’t always achieved.

There is doubtless a raft of reasons why solicitors may cease to act. For one, the 2013 reforms gradually prompted several firms to make a commercial decision to leave the personal injury market. But those file moves were happening long before 2013, and in costs assessments they were not probed too hard. It was moves that straddled the 2013 reforms which increased the focus. Paying parties were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll