header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007 / Craig Barlow , Jason M Hadden
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Features , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail

What lurks beneath

The scars left by the murder of headmaster Philip Lawrence were deepened by the failure to deport his killer. Here, Jason M Hadden and Craig Barlow discuss the issues

A mid hysterical press coverage, on 21 August 2007 the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AIT) held that the home secretary could not lawfully deport convicted murderer Learco Chindamo from the UK to Italy (IA/13107/2006).

That day on BBC News 24 the junior minister, Tony McNulty MP, informatively opined to viewers that by reaching that conclusion the AIT had misunderstood or misapplied the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998). Similarly, on 16 September 2007 the former home secretary, Dr John Reid, writing in the News of the World, suggested that public confidence in HRA 1998 had been damaged citing, among other examples, the Chindamo decision.

The reality, however, is that HRA 1998 has little to do with the outcome in Chindamo, the result was sadly inevitable and the culmination of a legislative and public policy fiasco that promises to repeat itself.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Digital informality meets hard-edged costs law. In this week's NLJ, David Bailey-Vella, chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers and legal director at Pogust Goodhead, examines MacInnes v DWF Law LLP, in which the Senior Courts Costs Office held that if a firm bills for WhatsApp work, those messages form part of the ‘file’—even if stored on personal devices
The NHS’s safety watchdog may itself need watching. Writing in NLJ this week, John F Mayberry, criminal barrister at 2DRJ, and Affifa Farrukh, consultant physician, examine the sweeping powers granted to the Health Services Safety Investigation Body under the Health and Care Act 2022
back-to-top-scroll