header-logo header-logo

12 January 2018 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

What’s in a name?

nlj_7776_backpage

Athelstane Aamodt explores the weird world of what exactly you can trade mark

Many of us who grew up watching Blue Peter will be able to remember the bafflement we felt when its presenters would routinely use the phrase ‘sticky-backed plastic’ when referring to Sellotape. Why did they call it that when no-one else in the world seemed to? We now know of course that the reason was to do with the BBC’s policy of not mentioning brand names on air; ‘Sellotape’, much like ‘Hoover’, was an example of a brand name or trade mark becoming practically synonymous with the product, much to the chagrin of their rivals no doubt.

Trade marks are everywhere these days, and their value, as well as the complexity of their registration and their protection, is big business. But what can you trade mark?

Surprises & restrictions

Many words that we use in everyday speech and writing are trade marks. Surprising examples that are or have been trade marks include ‘aspirin’ (a trade mark of Bayer), ‘escalator’ (a trade

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll