header-logo header-logo

What’s in a name?

12 January 2018 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail
nlj_7776_backpage

Athelstane Aamodt explores the weird world of what exactly you can trade mark

Many of us who grew up watching Blue Peter will be able to remember the bafflement we felt when its presenters would routinely use the phrase ‘sticky-backed plastic’ when referring to Sellotape. Why did they call it that when no-one else in the world seemed to? We now know of course that the reason was to do with the BBC’s policy of not mentioning brand names on air; ‘Sellotape’, much like ‘Hoover’, was an example of a brand name or trade mark becoming practically synonymous with the product, much to the chagrin of their rivals no doubt.

Trade marks are everywhere these days, and their value, as well as the complexity of their registration and their protection, is big business. But what can you trade mark?

Surprises & restrictions

Many words that we use in everyday speech and writing are trade marks. Surprising examples that are or have been trade marks include ‘aspirin’ (a trade mark of Bayer), ‘escalator’ (a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll