header-logo header-logo

12 January 2018 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

What’s in a name?

nlj_7776_backpage

Athelstane Aamodt explores the weird world of what exactly you can trade mark

Many of us who grew up watching Blue Peter will be able to remember the bafflement we felt when its presenters would routinely use the phrase ‘sticky-backed plastic’ when referring to Sellotape. Why did they call it that when no-one else in the world seemed to? We now know of course that the reason was to do with the BBC’s policy of not mentioning brand names on air; ‘Sellotape’, much like ‘Hoover’, was an example of a brand name or trade mark becoming practically synonymous with the product, much to the chagrin of their rivals no doubt.

Trade marks are everywhere these days, and their value, as well as the complexity of their registration and their protection, is big business. But what can you trade mark?

Surprises & restrictions

Many words that we use in everyday speech and writing are trade marks. Surprising examples that are or have been trade marks include ‘aspirin’ (a trade mark of Bayer), ‘escalator’ (a trade

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll