header-logo header-logo

13 August 2009 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7382 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

What is a will?

wills_austrilia_4

Court decisions are interpreting statute in ways that may surprise, says Michael Tringham

Brisbane law firm Mullins has successfully argued that an unsigned and undated document may be treated as the deceased’s will. Partner Michael Klatt reports: “Our client had handwritten his wishes in a will kit booklet, but had not signed or dated it and obviously had no witnesses sign the document.”

The case was further complicated by a properly executed 1993 will to which the deceased had stapled alterations that were signed and dated—but not witnessed.

While the Succession Act 1965 requires a will to be signed by or on behalf of a person in the presence of two witnesses, 2006 amendments give the court power to dispense with these requirements if it is satisfied that that a document was intended to form or alter a will.

“We were able to provide sufficient evidence that the will kit had been written by the deceased in his handwriting subsequent to the last alteration to the 1993 will. The family considered that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll