header-logo header-logo

Wheelchair users on buses only have a right to “reasonable adjustments”

10 December 2014
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The “first come first served” policy for the disabled bay on buses is not unlawful, the Court of Appeal has held.

Wheelchair user Doug Paulley brought a claim against First Bus Group after a driver refused to force a woman with a sleeping baby in a pushchair to vacate the wheelchair space. The woman said the pushchair did not fold down. The driver followed company policy. 

Paulley argued that he suffered a substantial disadvantage due to First Bus Group’s policy of asking rather than requiring passengers to step aside for wheelchair users.

Delivering judgment in First Group v Paulley [2014] EWCA Civ 1573, Lord Justice Lewison said the case was not about whether non-wheelchair users should make space for a passenger in a wheelchair, nor whether mothers with pushchairs should make way for a wheelchair user. 

“What is at issue is whether the bus company must have a policy to compel all other passengers to vacate the wheelchair space irrespective of the reason why they are in it, on pain of being made to leave the bus if they do not, leaving no discretion to the driver,” he said. 

He concluded that that was “a step too far”, and accepted First Bus Group’s appeal that their policy is not discriminatory or in breach of the Equality Act 2010.

He said that, while wheelchair users have a right to “reasonable adjustments”, it would not be reasonable for drivers to risk battery by forcibly removing passengers, nor could a driver be expected to adjudicate between competing claims and nor could a company be expected to sue a passenger who refused to move. Mothers with a pushchair could be ordered off a bus but their child could not. Mothers often had more than one child with them.

Unity Law, which acted for Paulley, is seeking leave to appeal.

Issue: 7634 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll