header-logo header-logo

Wheelchair users on buses only have a right to “reasonable adjustments”

10 December 2014
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The “first come first served” policy for the disabled bay on buses is not unlawful, the Court of Appeal has held.

Wheelchair user Doug Paulley brought a claim against First Bus Group after a driver refused to force a woman with a sleeping baby in a pushchair to vacate the wheelchair space. The woman said the pushchair did not fold down. The driver followed company policy. 

Paulley argued that he suffered a substantial disadvantage due to First Bus Group’s policy of asking rather than requiring passengers to step aside for wheelchair users.

Delivering judgment in First Group v Paulley [2014] EWCA Civ 1573, Lord Justice Lewison said the case was not about whether non-wheelchair users should make space for a passenger in a wheelchair, nor whether mothers with pushchairs should make way for a wheelchair user. 

“What is at issue is whether the bus company must have a policy to compel all other passengers to vacate the wheelchair space irrespective of the reason why they are in it, on pain of being made to leave the bus if they do not, leaving no discretion to the driver,” he said. 

He concluded that that was “a step too far”, and accepted First Bus Group’s appeal that their policy is not discriminatory or in breach of the Equality Act 2010.

He said that, while wheelchair users have a right to “reasonable adjustments”, it would not be reasonable for drivers to risk battery by forcibly removing passengers, nor could a driver be expected to adjudicate between competing claims and nor could a company be expected to sue a passenger who refused to move. Mothers with a pushchair could be ordered off a bus but their child could not. Mothers often had more than one child with them.

Unity Law, which acted for Paulley, is seeking leave to appeal.

Issue: 7634 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll