header-logo header-logo

When science doesn't meet the law

10 July 2008 / Carole Mccartney
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The absence of forensic skills in the legal profession needs to be addressed, says Carole McCartney

As television viewers and legal professionals alike will attest, forensic science is increasingly pivotal in criminal investigations and central to the detection of crime. It has also long been called upon to assist with a myriad of other “legal” investigations such as health and safety investigations; anti-terrorism, family and immigration cases, and other regulatory or civil issues. Upon qualification, all lawyers are quickly required to understand and manipulate information from scientists and other experts. Moreover, the significance of forensic science to the legal system can only be expected to increase with scientific developments occurring at a fast pace, yet there is growing concern about whether the legal profession are keeping up with the scientists.

The “problems” with forensic science, and mistakes made by experts, are rehearsed in the media on an increasingly regular basis. Normally absent from such criticisms is any examination of why it was that no lawyer was able to spot a potential issue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to head international insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
back-to-top-scroll