header-logo header-logo

When the Prime Minister falls ill

29 April 2020 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
19893
Alec Samuels addresses the quandary of dealing with illness or worse in No 10

What happens if the Prime Minister (PM) falls ill, or becomes incapacitated, or dies? The unwritten constitution does not give an answer. We pragmatically ‘bumble through’. The country is governed by the government, usually drawn from the political party with a majority or in command of the House of Commons. The function of government is carried out by the Cabinet. The Cabinet is chosen by the PM, exercising the power to hire and fire, who is a member albeit primus inter pares, first among equals, the leader. His or her influence is enormous.

It is rare for a PM to die in office. Spencer Perceval was assassinated in 1812. Palmerston died in office in 1865. Otherwise a dying PM has resigned, for example, Henry Campbell-Bannerman in 1908, and Andrew Bonar Law in 1923. Other PMs have resigned, thinking that they might be becoming ill and unfit, for example, Harold Macmillan in 1963, though

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll