header-logo header-logo

06 July 2012 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Where is the justice?

200516419-001_4

Is the government attempting to impede the quest for justice of torture victims, asks Richard Scorer

In the aftermath of 9/11, western countries embarked on a “war on terror”. Many argue that this war led to some western governments, including our own, becoming complicit in the torture of terrorist suspects. Subsequent civil litigation against the British government, including damages claims by torture victims, has thrown a spotlight on these covert activities.

State accountability

On one view, the damages claims have exposed serious state wrongdoing and as such, have reaffirmed the essential role of civil justice in ensuring state accountability. A contrary view is that these cases have potentially prejudiced security co-operation with friendly foreign governments, such as the US, putting us all at greater risk. This debate lies behind the recently published Justice and Security Bill which makes “closed material procedures” (CMPs) available across the civil justice system and seeks to abolish the Norwich Pharmacal Order (NPO) in cases involving the security services. These are major changes to our legal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Jasmine Olomolaiye, Foot Anstey

NLJ Career Profile: Jasmine Olomolaiye, Foot Anstey

Jasmine Olomolaiye, partner at national law firm Foot Anstey, discusses the power of reading and the dizzying heights of her dream career

Freeths—Christopher Stephens

Freeths—Christopher Stephens

Strategic land specialist joins real estate practice as partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Pawlowski

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Pawlowski

Construction practice strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll