header-logo header-logo

Where is the justice?

06 July 2012 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
200516419-001_4

Is the government attempting to impede the quest for justice of torture victims, asks Richard Scorer

In the aftermath of 9/11, western countries embarked on a “war on terror”. Many argue that this war led to some western governments, including our own, becoming complicit in the torture of terrorist suspects. Subsequent civil litigation against the British government, including damages claims by torture victims, has thrown a spotlight on these covert activities.

State accountability

On one view, the damages claims have exposed serious state wrongdoing and as such, have reaffirmed the essential role of civil justice in ensuring state accountability. A contrary view is that these cases have potentially prejudiced security co-operation with friendly foreign governments, such as the US, putting us all at greater risk. This debate lies behind the recently published Justice and Security Bill which makes “closed material procedures” (CMPs) available across the civil justice system and seeks to abolish the Norwich Pharmacal Order (NPO) in cases involving the security services. These are major changes to our legal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll