header-logo header-logo

Where is the justice?

06 July 2012 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
200516419-001_4

Is the government attempting to impede the quest for justice of torture victims, asks Richard Scorer

In the aftermath of 9/11, western countries embarked on a “war on terror”. Many argue that this war led to some western governments, including our own, becoming complicit in the torture of terrorist suspects. Subsequent civil litigation against the British government, including damages claims by torture victims, has thrown a spotlight on these covert activities.

State accountability

On one view, the damages claims have exposed serious state wrongdoing and as such, have reaffirmed the essential role of civil justice in ensuring state accountability. A contrary view is that these cases have potentially prejudiced security co-operation with friendly foreign governments, such as the US, putting us all at greater risk. This debate lies behind the recently published Justice and Security Bill which makes “closed material procedures” (CMPs) available across the civil justice system and seeks to abolish the Norwich Pharmacal Order (NPO) in cases involving the security services. These are major changes to our legal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll