header-logo header-logo

Whiplash boost fails to impress

27 November 2024
Issue: 8096 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Compensation
printer mail-detail
A 15% increase in the tariff for soft tissue injuries ‘is not enough’, the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) has warned.

The Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood announced the rise last week in response both to Consumer Price Index inflation since 2021, when whiplash reforms took effect and tariffs were introduced, and forecasted inflation to May 2027, when the next statutory review is likely to take place.

Under the Civil Liability Act 2018, the Lord Chancellor sets a tariff for whiplash injuries of up to two years in duration and makes regulations to do so, and is required to review those regulations within three years of implementation. The Act also banned offers to settle claims without medical evidence.

Mahmood kept the existing split structure of whiplash only and whiplash plus minor psychological injury tariffs, and the allowable judicial uplift of 20% of the tariff award for exceptional injuries or circumstances. She made no change to the definitions of what constitutes appropriate medical evidence and who may provide it prior to an offer to settle being made.

However, APIL president Kim Harrison said: ‘Following this review injured people will receive less compensation in real terms than they did in 2021 when the tariff was introduced.

‘If the Lord Chancellor were simply to increase the actual tariff, as introduced, in line with inflation using the Consumer Price Index, rather than making convoluted predictions about future inflation, the increase to damages in the tariff would be 22%. Increases in inflation have been eroding injured people’s damages since the tariff was introduced, a tariff which was set at an insulting, arbitrary level to begin with.

‘The facts are that since the tariff came into effect, the number of claims has plummeted, the cost of injury claims to insurers has nosedived, and yet motor premiums have continued to rise.’

Issue: 8096 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Compensation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll