header-logo header-logo

11 January 2021
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Whiplash: delayed again

Reforms to whiplash claims have been postponed again, this time to May 2021, because of the impact of the pandemic on the insurance, legal and medical sectors

In a written statement this week, the Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland QC said the government remained ‘firmly committed’ to the measures, which include raising the small claims track limit to £5,000 for road traffic injury cases, banning offers to settle prior to a medical report and introducing tariffs for claims. Last year, the Lord Chancellor delayed the reforms to April 2021.

Ian Davies, head of motor at insurance law firm Kennedys, said the additional delay was ‘sensible’.

‘All parties, be they lay claimant’s, claimant lawyers, insurers, claims handling companies or defendant law firms, will need at least three months to update and amend their systems to accommodate the new rules,’ he said.

‘What is urgently required are the rules themselves. The delay should not delay the release of the rules, the more time all parties have to consider the rules and implement system changes will make for a smoother implementation for all.’

Nigel Teasdale, past-president of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL) and partner at DWF, said he believed the rules were likely to be published at the end of January or early February as the Civil Procedure Rules Committee have a meeting scheduled for 5 February, which would give the three-month period of preparation previously requested by all parts of the industry.

He said the delay was ‘not as long as some had predicted’.

Sam Elsby, president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil) said: ‘Work on the new system has been dangerously compressed to meet this artificial deadline, so we welcome any delay which is used to address our concerns about outstanding issues of critical importance to injured people.

‘We need to know exactly how the proposed new “bespoke” court process will replace ADR (alternative dispute resolution); we need to know the outcome of consultation with the Lord Chief Justice about the new whiplash tariffs, and there needs to be clarification about how mixed claims will be handled in the new system.’

Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Louise Woods

Haynes Boone—Louise Woods

Haynes Boone expands global capabilities with addition of Louise Woods as chair of international disputes

DWF—John Gilfedder

DWF—John Gilfedder

DWF strengthens Global Risks practice with strategic hire of aviation partner in London

Shakespeare Martineau—10 newly qualified solicitors

Shakespeare Martineau—10 newly qualified solicitors

Shakespeare Martineau appoints newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The Thirlwall Inquiry has exposed a ‘complete failure’ to protect babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital, but its recommendations must now be put into practice
More than 500 former rugby players can pursue brain injury claims despite serious failures to disclose documents ordered by the High Court
A divorced woman has secured funding to participate in her former husband’s inquest after the Legal Aid Agency reconsidered repeated refusals
Developers in areas with poorly performing councils can apply directly to the Planning Inspectorate for permission under section 62A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
When does a solicitor’s retainer become a contentious business agreement? The Court of Appeal’s decision in Broadfield Law UK LLP v Barnes shows that listing hourly rates alone will not do, leaving firms and clients uncertain about their rights over bills
back-to-top-scroll