header-logo header-logo

11 January 2021
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Whiplash: delayed again

Reforms to whiplash claims have been postponed again, this time to May 2021, because of the impact of the pandemic on the insurance, legal and medical sectors

In a written statement this week, the Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland QC said the government remained ‘firmly committed’ to the measures, which include raising the small claims track limit to £5,000 for road traffic injury cases, banning offers to settle prior to a medical report and introducing tariffs for claims. Last year, the Lord Chancellor delayed the reforms to April 2021.

Ian Davies, head of motor at insurance law firm Kennedys, said the additional delay was ‘sensible’.

‘All parties, be they lay claimant’s, claimant lawyers, insurers, claims handling companies or defendant law firms, will need at least three months to update and amend their systems to accommodate the new rules,’ he said.

‘What is urgently required are the rules themselves. The delay should not delay the release of the rules, the more time all parties have to consider the rules and implement system changes will make for a smoother implementation for all.’

Nigel Teasdale, past-president of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL) and partner at DWF, said he believed the rules were likely to be published at the end of January or early February as the Civil Procedure Rules Committee have a meeting scheduled for 5 February, which would give the three-month period of preparation previously requested by all parts of the industry.

He said the delay was ‘not as long as some had predicted’.

Sam Elsby, president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil) said: ‘Work on the new system has been dangerously compressed to meet this artificial deadline, so we welcome any delay which is used to address our concerns about outstanding issues of critical importance to injured people.

‘We need to know exactly how the proposed new “bespoke” court process will replace ADR (alternative dispute resolution); we need to know the outcome of consultation with the Lord Chief Justice about the new whiplash tariffs, and there needs to be clarification about how mixed claims will be handled in the new system.’

Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll