header-logo header-logo

11 January 2021
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Whiplash: delayed again

Reforms to whiplash claims have been postponed again, this time to May 2021, because of the impact of the pandemic on the insurance, legal and medical sectors

In a written statement this week, the Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland QC said the government remained ‘firmly committed’ to the measures, which include raising the small claims track limit to £5,000 for road traffic injury cases, banning offers to settle prior to a medical report and introducing tariffs for claims. Last year, the Lord Chancellor delayed the reforms to April 2021.

Ian Davies, head of motor at insurance law firm Kennedys, said the additional delay was ‘sensible’.

‘All parties, be they lay claimant’s, claimant lawyers, insurers, claims handling companies or defendant law firms, will need at least three months to update and amend their systems to accommodate the new rules,’ he said.

‘What is urgently required are the rules themselves. The delay should not delay the release of the rules, the more time all parties have to consider the rules and implement system changes will make for a smoother implementation for all.’

Nigel Teasdale, past-president of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL) and partner at DWF, said he believed the rules were likely to be published at the end of January or early February as the Civil Procedure Rules Committee have a meeting scheduled for 5 February, which would give the three-month period of preparation previously requested by all parts of the industry.

He said the delay was ‘not as long as some had predicted’.

Sam Elsby, president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil) said: ‘Work on the new system has been dangerously compressed to meet this artificial deadline, so we welcome any delay which is used to address our concerns about outstanding issues of critical importance to injured people.

‘We need to know exactly how the proposed new “bespoke” court process will replace ADR (alternative dispute resolution); we need to know the outcome of consultation with the Lord Chief Justice about the new whiplash tariffs, and there needs to be clarification about how mixed claims will be handled in the new system.’

Issue: 7916 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll