header-logo header-logo

06 December 2023
Issue: 8052 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Whiplash portal clogged by ‘dormant’ claims

The Ministry of Justice has launched an investigation into the whiplash portal backlog, after MPs raised concerns

The House of Commons Justice Committee warned in a report in September, Whiplash reform and the Official Injury Claim Service, that about 349,000 claims in the Official Injury Claim (OIC) portal ‘remained unresolved’. The MPs said only ‘just over a quarter’ had reached settlement since the portal was set up in May 2021, and called on ministers to investigate the reasons for the delays.

Responding last week, the MoJ said the number of claims had grown to 385,000 as of 30 September. It said it is investigating all stages of the claims cycle and will publish additional data from January to help clarify the ‘impact of dormant claims on outstanding claim volumes’. It said there are ‘an increasing number of claims sitting on the system where no positive action to move them forward has been taken for some time and could, therefore, be considered as dormant’.

Sir Bob Neill MP, chair of the Justice Committee, welcomed the MoJ’s commitment to investigate but expressed disappointment at the ten per cent increase in claims since September.

‘One of the objectives of the OIC portal was to simplify and speed up the process of making a claim for whiplash injuries and it is vital that becomes a reality for all those using the system both represented and unrepresented.’

In its response last week, the MoJ said unrepresented claimants are settling their claims in about 167 days compared to 327 days for represented claimants. It found a ‘notable difference’ between the liability decision to first offer stage, which took on average 217 days for represented claimants and 74 days for unrepresented claimants. OIC data showed the average settlement amounts for represented and unrepresented claimants were £731 and £738 for whiplash and £952 and £981 for other injuries.

Issue: 8052 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll