header-logo header-logo

Whiplash reforms begin

02 June 2021
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
DIY claims in new digital portal to tackle ‘whiplash culture’

The government’s controversial whiplash reforms came into force this week, ushering in a new DIY digital portal for claims up to £5,000.

The changes, which the government said were geared to tackle ‘whiplash culture’, enable claimants to pursue small claims up to £5,000 (raised from a limit of £1,000) without using a lawyer. Legal costs are not recoverable. Fixed tariffs of compensation apply, depending on how long the claimant was affected, up to a two-year limit, and medical evidence must be obtained prior to any offer to settle.

The Ministry of Justice says the number of whiplash claims―there were 550,000 in 2019/20―is unacceptably high, and the reforms will lower insurance premiums by as much as £35 a year.

Dominic Clayden, chief executive of the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB), which will operate the Official Injury Claim online claims portal, said: ‘MIB’s focus has always been about making sure the new legal process is as easy and straightforward as possible.’

The Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland QC, said the changes would put an end to ‘greedy opportunism’ and put savings back into the pockets of drivers.

However, personal injury lawyers say the changes will benefit insurers at the expense of injured victims.

Qamar Anwar, managing director, First4Lawyers, said: ‘This is a sad day for justice.

‘All available data shows that the supposed whiplash culture is a fiction, yet the government has ploughed on regardless. While the government might sell these reforms as an opportunity for claimants to settle their claims quickly and without the need for court, the reality is quite different.

‘The introduction of a do-it-yourself online portal for claims worth up to £5,000 has been accompanied by a snappy 64-page user guide. How many claimants do they think will sift through 64 pages to guide them through their claim? Worse still, how will claimants know if their claim is worth more or less than £5,000?’

Kathryn Hart, partner, Lime Solicitors, said: ‘Three months whiplash injuries will garner you the sum of £240―increased to £260 if you have also had minor psychological injuries. By way of comparison, currently you would receive an award of up to £2,300.’

Issue: 7935 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll