header-logo header-logo

Whiplash truth & lies

15 November 2012
Issue: 7538 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Many whiplash sufferers do not claim compensation

Nearly 40% of whiplash sufferers do not claim compensation, according to a report by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL).

Of 4,000 people surveyed by APIL, one per cent (51 people) had suffered a whiplash injury in the past year, and 522 people had suffered whiplash at some point in their life.

Of those 522 people, only 321 (more than 60%) had made a claim for their injury.

According to APIL, whiplash claims have fallen by 24,000 in the last year. It says one in five sufferers have symptoms for more than one year, 30% of claims are encouraged by insurers, and 90% of sufferers are diagnosed by a medical professional.

APIL is calling for “free and prompt exchange of information” between the RTA claims portal and the Insurance Fraud Bureau to help identify fraudulent activity at the earliest opportunity, and for whiplash claimants or their solicitors to sign a “statement of truth” and be prosecuted for fraud if they breach it.

It also wants insurers banned from making offers of compensation before a medical report has been seen, and “robust enforcement” of the imminent ban on the sale of claimants’ personal details by the defendant’s insurers.

Launching the paper, The Whiplash Report 2012, at the House of Commons last week, APIL president Karl Tonks told MPs: “The people who suffer these injuries are genuine.”

Issue: 7538 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll