header-logo header-logo

15 November 2012
Issue: 7538 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Whiplash truth & lies

Many whiplash sufferers do not claim compensation

Nearly 40% of whiplash sufferers do not claim compensation, according to a report by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL).

Of 4,000 people surveyed by APIL, one per cent (51 people) had suffered a whiplash injury in the past year, and 522 people had suffered whiplash at some point in their life.

Of those 522 people, only 321 (more than 60%) had made a claim for their injury.

According to APIL, whiplash claims have fallen by 24,000 in the last year. It says one in five sufferers have symptoms for more than one year, 30% of claims are encouraged by insurers, and 90% of sufferers are diagnosed by a medical professional.

APIL is calling for “free and prompt exchange of information” between the RTA claims portal and the Insurance Fraud Bureau to help identify fraudulent activity at the earliest opportunity, and for whiplash claimants or their solicitors to sign a “statement of truth” and be prosecuted for fraud if they breach it.

It also wants insurers banned from making offers of compensation before a medical report has been seen, and “robust enforcement” of the imminent ban on the sale of claimants’ personal details by the defendant’s insurers.

Launching the paper, The Whiplash Report 2012, at the House of Commons last week, APIL president Karl Tonks told MPs: “The people who suffer these injuries are genuine.”

Issue: 7538 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll