header-logo header-logo

Whisky woes taken to the EC

26 July 2012
Issue: 7524 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

SWA challenges minimum pricing of alcohol

The Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) has launched legal action against minimum pricing of alcohol.

It has lodged a complaint with the European Commission and, along with other drinks companies, has filed a petition for judicial review with the Court of Session.

SWA’s complaint to the EC states that minimum unit pricing (MUP) breaches EU competition rules and would artificially distort trade in the alcoholic drinks market. It is concerned that other member states might adopt MUP measures and use a “protection of health” justification to target imported products, which could cost the Scotch whisky industry £500m in exports.

It is seeking judicial review on the grounds MUP breaches the UK’s EU Treaty obligations and runs contrary to the terms of the Scotland Act 1998.

Gavin Hewitt, SWA chief executive, says: “Despite warnings that minimum pricing of alcohol would be illegal, the Scottish government has pressed ahead with its ill-targeted policy and misguided legislation.”

Co-petitioner Jose Ramon Fernandez, on behalf of the European Wine Committee, says: “We believe the setting of a minimum price contravenes rules governing the wine common market organisation across the EU.

“It will also act as a discriminatory barrier to trade for imported wines from companies which enjoy a competitive lower cost base.”

In March, the government proposed introducing a minimum price of £0.40 per unit of alcohol in England and Wales.

Issue: 7524 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll