header-logo header-logo

A whistleblowers’ code

04 December 2013
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Charity calls for a new code of practice on whistleblowing

Current legislation on whistleblowing is not working and a new code of practice should be adopted in all UK workplaces, a major report has concluded.

Employment tribunal panel members should also be given specialist training on whistleblowers, and courts and tribunals should be able to take non-compliance with the code into account when considering cases.

The report, published last week by the Whistleblowing Commission, which was set up in February by the charity Public Concern at Work to make recommendations for change, notes that less than half of UK employees are aware of a whistleblowing policy at their workplace.

Its proposed code, published with its report, sets out standards for organisations and businesses, and includes guidance for employers, their workers and representatives on how to deal with any whistleblowing issue. Failure to listen and act contributed to the poor standards of care at the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, the report says, while whistleblowers were ignored on LIBOR rigging and the Jimmy Savile sex abuse scandal.

It recommends that the Public Interest Disclosure Act (PIDA) be strengthened and extended to cover a broader range of workers including doctors, social workers, foster carers and volunteers. It calls on regulatory bodies to be transparent about their own whistleblowing arrangements, and to “require or encourage” the adoption of the code by those they regulate, and calls for specific provisions against the blacklisting of whistleblowers.

In research by Public Concern at Work among 1,000 whistleblowers, three-quarters said nothing was done and 60% received no response.

Issue: 7587 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll