header-logo header-logo

Who are the judges? LCJ pledges to improve representation

03 July 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity , Career focus
printer mail-detail
‘Progress is too slow’ on judicial diversity, the Lady Chief Justice, Baroness Carr has said

Nearly one in eight of all judges are now from ethnic minority backgrounds (12% of the total, up from 7% in 2015). However, representation of Black judges has remained at 1% of all judges, according to the judicial diversity statistics 2024-2025, published this week.

Solicitors are generally under-represented in the judiciary and tended to fare less well in judicial selection exercises. Roughly speaking, the courts judiciary is composed of 70% barristers and 30% solicitors. In the tribunals judiciary, the split is roughly 40% barristers and 60% solicitors. Taken together, the judiciary as a whole is made up 60% barristers to 40% solicitors.

Women are proportionately represented in all but the highest echelons of the judiciary—44% of all judges but only 23% in the Court of Appeal (nine Lady Justices) and 30% in the High Court (32 judges).

Among magistrates, both women and ethnic minority representation is higher than among the rest of the judiciary—57% of magistrates are women, and 14% are ethnic minority.

One in ten judges (8% in courts and 15% in tribunals) reported they are disabled. Insufficient numbers of judges declared their socio-economic background to meet the 60% threshold for publication.

Baroness Carr said: ‘I am determined to improve diversity in the judiciary. It is one of my key priorities… we will persist in our efforts to make real change.’

Law Society president, Richard Atkinson said: ‘Significant progress is still required before the judiciary can truly represent the wider society.

‘The representation of Black legal professionals on the bench has remained stubbornly stagnant for over a decade, showing that efforts to make improvements are not having the desired impact. More work needs to be done.

‘Solicitors are continuing to achieve appointments as judges at disproportionately low rates compared with barristers and the numbers are falling. Our concerns remain that until this percentage significantly increases, we will struggle to persuade our members that entry to the judiciary is a level playing field.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll