header-logo header-logo

Who are the judges? LCJ pledges to improve representation

03 July 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity , Career focus
printer mail-detail
‘Progress is too slow’ on judicial diversity, the Lady Chief Justice, Baroness Carr has said

Nearly one in eight of all judges are now from ethnic minority backgrounds (12% of the total, up from 7% in 2015). However, representation of Black judges has remained at 1% of all judges, according to the judicial diversity statistics 2024-2025, published this week.

Solicitors are generally under-represented in the judiciary and tended to fare less well in judicial selection exercises. Roughly speaking, the courts judiciary is composed of 70% barristers and 30% solicitors. In the tribunals judiciary, the split is roughly 40% barristers and 60% solicitors. Taken together, the judiciary as a whole is made up 60% barristers to 40% solicitors.

Women are proportionately represented in all but the highest echelons of the judiciary—44% of all judges but only 23% in the Court of Appeal (nine Lady Justices) and 30% in the High Court (32 judges).

Among magistrates, both women and ethnic minority representation is higher than among the rest of the judiciary—57% of magistrates are women, and 14% are ethnic minority.

One in ten judges (8% in courts and 15% in tribunals) reported they are disabled. Insufficient numbers of judges declared their socio-economic background to meet the 60% threshold for publication.

Baroness Carr said: ‘I am determined to improve diversity in the judiciary. It is one of my key priorities… we will persist in our efforts to make real change.’

Law Society president, Richard Atkinson said: ‘Significant progress is still required before the judiciary can truly represent the wider society.

‘The representation of Black legal professionals on the bench has remained stubbornly stagnant for over a decade, showing that efforts to make improvements are not having the desired impact. More work needs to be done.

‘Solicitors are continuing to achieve appointments as judges at disproportionately low rates compared with barristers and the numbers are falling. Our concerns remain that until this percentage significantly increases, we will struggle to persuade our members that entry to the judiciary is a level playing field.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll