header-logo header-logo

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Who benefits?

Paul Hewitt and Paola Fudakowska report on beneficial ownership

In (1) Antony Stow (2) Richard Stow (3) Alhaji Ahmed v (1) Zoe Stow (2) Comissioners for HMRC (3) Estate of Edward Stow (4) Gareth Stow [2008] WTLR 1103 the third defendant (E) and the third claimant (K) were business colleagues. K settled assets on trust (the B Trust) and later used those funds to create a further six settlements (the N settlements). HMRC contended that the B Trust was a sham and E had provided the assets, therefore making E the settlor of the N settlement for tax purposes. HMRC issued notices of determination of tax on the trustees of the N settlement in the amount of £20m.

In 2005, E died leaving an estate of about £5m. E's wife, the first defendant (Z), was indicating an intention to claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 against both E's estate, and the trustees under s 10. The first and second claimants, (A) and (R), and the fourth defendant (G) were trustees of the N

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll