header-logo header-logo

Who benefits?

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Paul Hewitt and Paola Fudakowska report on beneficial ownership

In (1) Antony Stow (2) Richard Stow (3) Alhaji Ahmed v (1) Zoe Stow (2) Comissioners for HMRC (3) Estate of Edward Stow (4) Gareth Stow [2008] WTLR 1103 the third defendant (E) and the third claimant (K) were business colleagues. K settled assets on trust (the B Trust) and later used those funds to create a further six settlements (the N settlements). HMRC contended that the B Trust was a sham and E had provided the assets, therefore making E the settlor of the N settlement for tax purposes. HMRC issued notices of determination of tax on the trustees of the N settlement in the amount of £20m.

In 2005, E died leaving an estate of about £5m. E's wife, the first defendant (Z), was indicating an intention to claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 against both E's estate, and the trustees under s 10. The first and second claimants, (A) and (R), and the fourth defendant (G) were trustees of the N

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to head international insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll