header-logo header-logo

17 February 2012 / Barbara Hewson
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Features , Public , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Who guards the guardians?

Barbara Hewson examines the uneasy relationship between guardians & resistive patients

Peter Jackson J has handed down an important judgment which confirms the extent of guardians’ powers, in relation to people who lack capacity. C v Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council & Blackburn with Darwen Teaching Care Trust [2011] EWHC 3321 (COP) deals with the unusual situation where a person subject to guardianship is also deprived of his liberty under a standard authorisation, and challenges that deprivation in the Court of Protection. C was challenging his deprivation. A novel issue arose in this case: whether the Court of Protection has any jurisdiction over a guardian’s decision-making.

The guardian’s role

Section 8(1) of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MeHA 1983) reads (emphasis added): “Where a guardianship application, duly made...to the local social services authority within the period allowed by subsection (2) below is accepted by that authority, the application shall...confer on the authority or person named in the application as guardian, to the exclusion of any other person: (a) the power to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll