header-logo header-logo

17 February 2012 / Barbara Hewson
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Features , Public , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Who guards the guardians?

Barbara Hewson examines the uneasy relationship between guardians & resistive patients

Peter Jackson J has handed down an important judgment which confirms the extent of guardians’ powers, in relation to people who lack capacity. C v Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council & Blackburn with Darwen Teaching Care Trust [2011] EWHC 3321 (COP) deals with the unusual situation where a person subject to guardianship is also deprived of his liberty under a standard authorisation, and challenges that deprivation in the Court of Protection. C was challenging his deprivation. A novel issue arose in this case: whether the Court of Protection has any jurisdiction over a guardian’s decision-making.

The guardian’s role

Section 8(1) of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MeHA 1983) reads (emphasis added): “Where a guardianship application, duly made...to the local social services authority within the period allowed by subsection (2) below is accepted by that authority, the application shall...confer on the authority or person named in the application as guardian, to the exclusion of any other person: (a) the power to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll