header-logo header-logo

Who guards the guardians?

17 February 2012 / Barbara Hewson
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Features , Public , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Barbara Hewson examines the uneasy relationship between guardians & resistive patients

Peter Jackson J has handed down an important judgment which confirms the extent of guardians’ powers, in relation to people who lack capacity. C v Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council & Blackburn with Darwen Teaching Care Trust [2011] EWHC 3321 (COP) deals with the unusual situation where a person subject to guardianship is also deprived of his liberty under a standard authorisation, and challenges that deprivation in the Court of Protection. C was challenging his deprivation. A novel issue arose in this case: whether the Court of Protection has any jurisdiction over a guardian’s decision-making.

The guardian’s role

Section 8(1) of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MeHA 1983) reads (emphasis added): “Where a guardianship application, duly made...to the local social services authority within the period allowed by subsection (2) below is accepted by that authority, the application shall...confer on the authority or person named in the application as guardian, to the exclusion of any other person: (a) the power to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll