header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Who judges the judges?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
29 April 2022 / John Gould
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail
79596
An open & rigorous process for dealing with complaints of judicial misconduct is essential to maintaining public trust, says John Gould

It may come as a surprise to learn that there are 22,000 judges in England and Wales. If judges were a regulated profession, they would be the second largest body of individuals involved in legal services. By comparison, as at 1 April 2021 there were only 17,123 barristers and only 8,769 Chartered Legal Executives out of a total CILEX membership of around 21,000.

There is no doubting that all of these judicial appointees do important work and that maintaining very high levels of confidence in them is perhaps the key element in maintaining confidence in the rule of law itself. Yet, how judges are regulated and disciplined, as well as when and why, is not well known even among legal professionals; still less among the public at large.

Means of investigation

Since it was formed in 2013, following a review by the late Lord Toulson, the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll