header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Who judges the judges?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
29 April 2022 / John Gould
Issue: 7976 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail
79596
An open & rigorous process for dealing with complaints of judicial misconduct is essential to maintaining public trust, says John Gould

It may come as a surprise to learn that there are 22,000 judges in England and Wales. If judges were a regulated profession, they would be the second largest body of individuals involved in legal services. By comparison, as at 1 April 2021 there were only 17,123 barristers and only 8,769 Chartered Legal Executives out of a total CILEX membership of around 21,000.

There is no doubting that all of these judicial appointees do important work and that maintaining very high levels of confidence in them is perhaps the key element in maintaining confidence in the rule of law itself. Yet, how judges are regulated and disciplined, as well as when and why, is not well known even among legal professionals; still less among the public at large.

Means of investigation

Since it was formed in 2013, following a review by the late Lord Toulson, the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Read All
Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll