header-logo header-logo

Who should pay for social care nursing?

06 October 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7764 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

When nursing care is provided in a social care context, who foots the bill? Nicholas Dobson looks at the Supreme Court case of Forge Care Homes

  • In the context of social care, nursing care by an NHS nurse covers care which in all the circumstances ought to be provided by a registered nurse because it is ‘ancillary to or closely connected with or part and parcel of the nursing care which she has to provide’.

We know that NHS services are generally free at the point of delivery. Social care, on the other hand, is local authority-funded and subject to client means-testing. But what if nursing care is provided in a predominantly social care context? Who pays and for what? It was this scenario that the Supreme Court had to tackle on 2 August 2017 in R (Forge Care Homes Ltd and others) v Cardiff and Vale University Health Board and others [2017] UKSC 56. Lady Hale gave the only substantive judgment, with which Lords Clake, Wilson, Carnwath and Hodge agreed.

Background

As

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

Firm elects new senior partner to lead next phase of growth

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Partner appointed head of family and divorce

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Financial and professional risks team expand with dual partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll