header-logo header-logo

Who should pay for social care nursing?

06 October 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7764 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

When nursing care is provided in a social care context, who foots the bill? Nicholas Dobson looks at the Supreme Court case of Forge Care Homes

  • In the context of social care, nursing care by an NHS nurse covers care which in all the circumstances ought to be provided by a registered nurse because it is ‘ancillary to or closely connected with or part and parcel of the nursing care which she has to provide’.

We know that NHS services are generally free at the point of delivery. Social care, on the other hand, is local authority-funded and subject to client means-testing. But what if nursing care is provided in a predominantly social care context? Who pays and for what? It was this scenario that the Supreme Court had to tackle on 2 August 2017 in R (Forge Care Homes Ltd and others) v Cardiff and Vale University Health Board and others [2017] UKSC 56. Lady Hale gave the only substantive judgment, with which Lords Clake, Wilson, Carnwath and Hodge agreed.

Background

As

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll