header-logo header-logo

21 September 2012
Issue: 7530 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Who to trust?

The law surrounding cohabitees & trusts of land continues to evolve, says Greg Williams

There are over four million unmarried couples cohabiting in England and Wales. Many of those couples undoubtedly believe in the fallacy of the “common law marriage”. This myth survives because it is erroneously referred to in everyday speech, perhaps perpetuated by the media and application forms for insurance, loans and mortgages.

Decline in marriage

Marriage rates have been in decline for over 30 years. Even those couples who do marry (one can think of a topical Royal example) tend to live together for at least a few years before they tie the knot.
On 9 November 2011, the Supreme Court gave its decision in the landmark case of Kernott v Jones [2011] UKSC 53, [2012] AC 776.

That case provided an opportunity for the Court to revisit the House of Lords’ decision in Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 All ER 929.

The outcome of Kernott was widely discussed at the time. It was not lost on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll