header-logo header-logo

Who would want to be a High Court judge?

26 November 2021 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
65104
Vexatious litigants, lacklustre lodgings & tight turnaround times: Dominic Regan ponders the downsides of a seat on the High Court bench

Elevation to the High Court bench sounds astonishing, doesn’t it? Well, it isn’t. A recent appointee was looking forward to getting the one reward money cannot buy—a knighthood. The curmudgeonly palace would only allow him one guest in attendance!

Talent today is the pre-requisite in order to acquire the coveted red dressing gown. Those who take up office inevitably relinquish a substantial income. They are always in demand and undertake a vast amount of work. The stipend today is £192,679, which might sound like loads to some, yet isn’t that much more than City firms are paying newly qualified youngsters.

Another revelation for my friend was Pay As You Earn. As a barrister, he was of course self-employed and collected income gross. To see thousands withheld at the source each month was a harsh introduction to the real world.

Going out on circuit and dealing with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll