header-logo header-logo

Who would want to be a High Court judge?

26 November 2021 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
65104
Vexatious litigants, lacklustre lodgings & tight turnaround times: Dominic Regan ponders the downsides of a seat on the High Court bench

Elevation to the High Court bench sounds astonishing, doesn’t it? Well, it isn’t. A recent appointee was looking forward to getting the one reward money cannot buy—a knighthood. The curmudgeonly palace would only allow him one guest in attendance!

Talent today is the pre-requisite in order to acquire the coveted red dressing gown. Those who take up office inevitably relinquish a substantial income. They are always in demand and undertake a vast amount of work. The stipend today is £192,679, which might sound like loads to some, yet isn’t that much more than City firms are paying newly qualified youngsters.

Another revelation for my friend was Pay As You Earn. As a barrister, he was of course self-employed and collected income gross. To see thousands withheld at the source each month was a harsh introduction to the real world.

Going out on circuit and dealing with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll