header-logo header-logo

12 October 2012 / Clive Howard , Julian Roskill
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

A whole new world

What do ABSs mean for individual partners, ask Clive Howard & Julian Roskill

If you had joined a partnership some 30 years ago, you might have expected to spend your entire professional career at the same firm. You would have worked hard and had a fair degree of autonomy to develop your practice area. You competed with your professional colleagues in other law firms. Management tended to play a supporting role, allowing you to focus on your legal skills.

There are several reasons why this is no longer true today, notably:

  • the deregulation of the financial services marketplace, which created major financial institutions and then large professional legal and accountancy firms with broader offerings to clients;
  • the relaxing of advertising rules, which changed how law firms saw and competed against each other;
  • the arrival, mainly in London, of foreign law firms; and
  • the emphasis on the profitability of individual practice areas.

The result? Partners in some firms found themselves working in more modern, competitive businesses, managed centrally in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
back-to-top-scroll