header-logo header-logo

14 November 2018
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-detail

Who's at the wheel?

Driverless cars and other automated vehicles are the subject of a Law Commission consultation into potential regulatory reform. The Automated Vehicles consultation, launched last week and due to end on 8 February 2019, explores how to ensure safety for passengers and the wider public and who would be responsible for accidents. It is part of a three-year government review into the legal ramifications of automated vehicles. Key questions include how to adapt road rules developed for humans, for example, should an automated vehicle mount the pavement to let an ambulance through, like a human would in an emergency? 

Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll