header-logo header-logo

09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Whose baby is it anyway?

What rights do women have to conceal their pregnancy from the fathers-to-be? Julie O'Malley explores the issues

In cases where women have wished to conceal their pregnancy from the father, the courts have traditionally shielded the mothers and allowed adoption relatively unimpeded at the expense of children being left potentially unaware of their background and without any opportunity to find a father and hence the paternal side of the family.

This has been justified on practical rather than dogmatic grounds. For example, in the leading case of Re C (a child) v XYZ County Council and EC (2007) [2007] EWCA Civ 1206, [2007] All ER (D) 368 (Nov) it was decided that the interests of the child were such that the delay inherent in consulting the father, his family, or the family of the mother would be inimical to the interests of the child. Lady Justice Arden found that under the provisions of the Adoption and Children Act 2002: “When a decision requires to be made about the long-term care of a child whom a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll