10 February 2011 / Jonathan Herring

Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family

printer

mail-detail

Whose baby is it anyway?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

family_1_4

Jonathan Herring reports on surrogacy dilemmas

Many people rejoiced with Elton John and David Furnish at the birth of their child on 25 December 2010. The child was born as a result of a surrogacy arrangement, which succeeded. Sadly, it is not always such plain sailing for commissioning parents. A surrogate mother gives birth, but refuses to hand over the baby to the commissioning couple. What should happen? Many an hour has been spent by law students considering such a dilemma, many a month by some law professors!

In essence that was the issue in Re T (a child) (surrogacy: residence) [2011] EWHC 33 (Fam), [2011] All ER (D) 171 (Jan). Mr Justice Baker opened his judgment by noting the grave dangers of entering a surrogacy arrangement. The “natural process of carrying and giving birth to a baby creates an attachment which may be so strong that the surrogate mother finds herself unable to give up the child. Such cases call for careful and sensitive handling by the law”.

A lukewarm

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Whose baby is it anyway?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

family_1_4

Jonathan Herring reports on surrogacy dilemmas

Many people rejoiced with Elton John and David Furnish at the birth of their child on 25 December 2010. The child was born as a result of a surrogacy arrangement, which succeeded. Sadly, it is not always such plain sailing for commissioning parents. A surrogate mother gives birth, but refuses to hand over the baby to the commissioning couple. What should happen? Many an hour has been spent by law students considering such a dilemma, many a month by some law professors!

In essence that was the issue in Re T (a child) (surrogacy: residence) [2011] EWHC 33 (Fam), [2011] All ER (D) 171 (Jan). Mr Justice Baker opened his judgment by noting the grave dangers of entering a surrogacy arrangement. The “natural process of carrying and giving birth to a baby creates an attachment which may be so strong that the surrogate mother finds herself unable to give up the child. Such cases call for careful and sensitive handling by the law”.

A lukewarm

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS

NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders

Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners

NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do

A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent

Your magistrates’ court needs you!

Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process

LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!

The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession

NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed

Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’

back-to-top-scroll