header-logo header-logo

Whose baby is it anyway?

10 February 2011 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail
family_1_4

Jonathan Herring reports on surrogacy dilemmas

Many people rejoiced with Elton John and David Furnish at the birth of their child on 25 December 2010. The child was born as a result of a surrogacy arrangement, which succeeded. Sadly, it is not always such plain sailing for commissioning parents. A surrogate mother gives birth, but refuses to hand over the baby to the commissioning couple. What should happen? Many an hour has been spent by law students considering such a dilemma, many a month by some law professors!

In essence that was the issue in Re T (a child) (surrogacy: residence) [2011] EWHC 33 (Fam), [2011] All ER (D) 171 (Jan). Mr Justice Baker opened his judgment by noting the grave dangers of entering a surrogacy arrangement. The “natural process of carrying and giving birth to a baby creates an attachment which may be so strong that the surrogate mother finds herself unable to give up the child. Such cases call for careful and sensitive handling by the law”.

A lukewarm

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll