header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 April 2007 / Lindy Golding , Penelope Thornton
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Media , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Whose format is it anyway?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Are television rights protectable in the UK? Lindy Golding and Penelope Thornton report

Copyright does not protect general ideas but the expression of ideas (see Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2001] FSR 11, [2001] 1 All ER 700). However, in IPC Media Ltd v Highbury-SPL Publishing Ltd [2004] EWHC 2985 (Ch), [2004] All ER (D) 342 (Dec) Mr Justice Laddie recognised the difficulty in  defining the boundary between the taking of general ideas and concepts and copying in the copyright sense.

Copyright protection for television programmes hit the news in November 2005 with the high-profile case brought by Simon Fuller's 19 TV against FremantleMedia Ltd, Simco Ltd, Syco Ltd and Simon Cowell. It involved a dispute about the music talent shows Pop Idol and The X Factor. However, the case settled without any further judicial guidance.

Spotlight on privacy

The rise in the popularity of reality television programmes has turned the spotlight on format piracy. In April 2000 the Format Recognition and Protection Association (FRAPA) was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll